Demolition
by Neglect
Historical
District Commission meets to discuss starting enforcement of zoning ordinance
By
Brian Ward
Durham- “Good morning”
Henry Smith said, walking in from the 7 p.m. darkness. Everyone in the room
smiled wryly as the Vice- Chair of the Durham Historical District Commission (HDC)
took his seat at the meeting table. The meeting started a few minutes later,
with only four of the six members of the commission in attendance and one other
person in the audience.
“I didn’t send out a
reminder” said Leslie Schwartz, the Chair of the HDC.
The HDC met last Thu. to
talk about the issue of demolition by neglect section of the town zoning
ordinance. Schwartz defined demolition by neglect as when “historic buildings
become dilapidated due to lack of upkeep.”
The demolition by
neglect section has previously existed in the Durham Zoning Ordinance, but has
not been enforced. While the HDC doesn’t have the authority
to enforce its ordinances, it can bring up violations to the Code Enforcement
Office, who can enforce them. The Historical District Commission is making
plans to work with the Code Enforcement Office to have property owners and
renters in the Historic Overlay District comply with the ordinance.
If a building in the
Historic Overlay District meets the requirements of demolition by neglect, the
owner or renter has 60 days to fix the problem. If they don’t, the town will make
the owner pay to cover the costs of the repairs. The ordinance gives owners 30
days to appeal to the HDC if they want to argue with the decision, and does
make some allowances for people in suffering financial hardships. However, the HDC
want to find less drastic ways of enforcing the ordinance.
“Largely what we do, is
take proactive measures rather than reactive. Rather than enforce the ordinance,
reach out to property owners and show what they can do to retain property value
and historical value.” Schwartz said.
Andrea Bodo, the commission’s
secretary, brought up the idea of holding workshops for people in the Historic
District, teaching them about how to maintain their home’s property and
historical value. She pointed out that many renters are unaware that there are tax
incentives for doing things like painting a home that they rent. The sole other
audience member briefly jumped in and suggested starting a mailing people in
the Historical District with information on the ordinance and ways to maintain
their homes.
Much of the time spent between
Schwartz and Town Council Representative Peter Stanhope, debating about how the
ordinance defined demolition by neglect and at what point a building be
considered to be deteriorated enough to require action by the Code Enforcement
Office.
Stanhope repeatedly
brought up the fact that the ordinance didn’t define deteriorated, and that it wasn’t
clear what conditions were. The point that was mentioned was whether the
ordinance was about safety or aesthetics, and if it took some peeled paint or
for the house need to be condemned to meet the standard of neglect.
“It feels subjective”
Stanhope said
“Everything we do
(here) is subjective.” Schwartz said.
“I hate subjectivity”
Stanhope replied, taking a second to add “In the hands of power.”
Work Cited
Bodo, Andrea. "HDC
Meeting." Personal interview. 3 Nov. 2011.
Schwartz, Leslie.
"HDC Meeting." Telephone interview. 11 Nov. 2011.
Stanhope, Peter.
"HDC Meeting." Personal interview. 3 Nov. 2011.
Town of Durham, NH
Official Web Site. 2008. Web. 07 Nov. 2011. <http://ci.durham.nh.us/>.
Lambert, George.
"Tax Deductions For Rental Property Owners." Investopedia.com - Your
Source For Investing Education. 13 Mar. 2010. Web. 07 Nov. 2011.
<http://www.investopedia.com/articles/pf/06/rentalowner.asp>.
Zoning Ordinance for
the Town of Durham. New Hampshire. Durham, NH, 2006. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment